Livestream Painting | Peinture en Direct

Note: This article describes an event that is now passed. To view the painting that resulted from this performance, click here.

I have the opportunity to perform a live painting, grâce à la galerie CAVA! The River City Chamber Orchestra, conducted by Armand Birk, will provide “exciting and emotionally satisfying” sounds from Rameau, Vivaldi, Finzi and Tchaikovsky; the dancers are ready to deliver energetic and dynamic performances; two other artists and I will express ourselves with paint and brush.


The livestream will take place on September 27 at 4 p.m. UTC-06.
J’ai l’occasion d’effectuer une peinture en direct, grâce à la galerie CAVA! Le River City Chamber Orchestra, dirigé par Armand Birk, fournira des sons «excitants et émotionnellement satisfaisants» de Rameau, Vivaldi, Finzi et Tchaikovsky; les danseurs sont prêts à offrir des performances énergiques et dynamiques; deux autres artistes et moi nous exprimerons avec de la peinture et du pinceau.

Le livestream aura lieu le 27 septembre à 16 h. UTC-06.

Preparing for a live painting has been an interesting experience, and I’ve had some insights along the way that I’d like to share with whoever’s interested.

When painting becomes a performance art, the process becomes part of the expression.

Typically we think of a painting as a very different endeavour from an orchestral concert, or a dance performance. One of the main reasons is that you only ever see the finished product, and there is very little (if any) temporal aspect in the way that you take it in. Listening to a concert or watching a ballet necessarily takes time, and during that time the performer can take you through a range of emotions. Each movement might tell a different story, and contain different themes, and only by taking them all in turn can you get the full effect the performer was going for. With a painting however, this usually isn’t possible. You see the whole canvas at once, and the artist isn’t there to reveal it to you in any particular way. But when the viewer is there for the creation of the painting, a whole host of new opportunities arise.

Artistic expression through performance is dependent on planning and practice.

I’ve done enough performing in my lifetime (though this is my first live painting) to know that you don’t just show up on stage and wing it. Typically, the people that are able to cooly improvise really well have spent an incredibly long time practicing and becoming comfortable both on stage and with their medium. Certainly, the jokes or the saxophone licks might be improvised on the spot, but you can be sure this isn’t the first time they’ve ever improvised.

I’ve been playing recently with a more improvised style, which I feel would be both fun to perform and fun to watch. But the nature of this style of painting is that you’re not sure how it’ll turn out. This is where the preparation comes in. I’ve spent the last few weeks turning over ideas, sketching things out, planning the composition, trying out colours, crafting stencils… Generally doing whatever I can to make sure that once I’m on stage I can just throw paint at the canvas (literally) and have a reasonable chance of having a good painting at the end.

Which reminds me… I need to find those drop-cloths.

Planning and practice are also good for refining ideas.

This painting has evolved a lot from first conception to what it will actually be on September 27. Usually when I have an idea that I’m excited about, it makes it onto the canvas in a few hours or days. But this time I’ve had to hold off and be patient—and since I’m carefully planning and practicing, I’ve been thinking about it a lot. I’ve developed a few themes that I’m hoping the finished painting will convey (and that the process will be a part of expressing):

  • The interplay between free-form improvisation and careful planning
  • Similarities between painting and performance arts
    • Colours and shapes can be thought of as similar to instruments in an orchestra. Each plays their part, which alone is beautiful but quite abstract; together they paint a complete picture that expresses the composer’s vision
  • Each performance is invisibly supported by centuries of human innovation and artistry
  • Seeing not only the performance, but also understanding all of the human effort that went into making it possible lends additional luminance to the art

We never work alone.

Even when I’m at home alone playing the piano, my artistry depends on other people. I depend on composers and performers that shaped musical theory and style, inventors that iterated on instrument design, scientists that discovered the physical principles that make them work, even the various political and societal structures that afforded these people the opportunity to do the work that they did.

Artists (of any kind) work to make the world a more beautiful place. Whether or not we work with other people, we never work alone. We’re only the end of this lineage so far.

Splatter Painting

I’ve been working hard at loosening up recently, and let me tell you: there’s nothing quite so therapeutic as taking a piece of cardboard out behind the barn and giving it a good swift beating—with a paintbrush, of course.Barn Splatter.jpg

I’m starting to play around with ideas about the tension between chaos and order, and between raw and curated beauty; things that have been on my mind since I wrote The Silence Here. I think there’s a lot more gold to be mined here, and I’ve had a lot of fun already.

I was surprised to find that a loose, dripping, splattering technique also worked quite well in watercolour, a medium which I always enjoyed because of the amount of control it affords. I was amazed to find how beautifully it works when you relinquish some of that control, and let the paint just do what it wants. This photo doesn’t quite do it justice, but there are some really interesting things happening with the colours, especially around Chester’s eyebrows.

In short, I suspect I’ll be playing around with my newfound techniques more; there’s a lot more fun to be had here.

Teacup Still Life

My cousin-in-law commissioned me to paint a still life for her, of a teacup with steaming tea, a crochet needle, and Walt Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass”. The quality of the result surpassed my expectations, and I think that was mostly due to a process I tried. Good artists use this method or one like it all the time, but I’m sometimes a stubborn and cavalier sort of fellow, so I had always thought I could do without it.

Composition and Lighting (~3h)

I started by arranging the items in every way I could think of, paying attention to leading lines, balance, and negative space. Once I found the composition that suited the objects best, I lit the scene using a lamp and a mirror to create dramatic shadows that drew attention to the focal points. I took a picture of the final arrangement and used that as my reference for the rest of the project so my perspective and lighting would be consistent.

Full.JPG
Reference photograph after composition and lighting arrangement

Line Drawing (~2h)

Using a grid overlaid on the reference photo, I carefully drew in the general outline and some details of the objects onto 140 lb watercolour paper with a 4H pencil.

 

Line Drawing
Line drawing

 

Background Wash and Steam (~1h)

Knowing the background would need to be dark for the steam to be visible against it, I used a mixture of intense blue and burnt umber, applied with much water in circular strokes with a no. 6 filbert brush. For the table, I used the same intense blue and burnt umber, but with more emphasis on the umber. I think I might have tossed in some burnt sienna as well. To keep the object edges sharp without impinging my free brushstrokes, I masked them off with green painter’s tape. If you use this technique, I strongly recommend de-stickifying the tape first by applying it several times to some cloth surface where it can pick up lint. Otherwise, you’ll end up losing a lot of your paper along with your mask.

The steam was going to make or break this picture (and I wasn’t sure I had the chops to do it well), so that’s what I wanted to get out of the way right from the get-go. If it wasn’t going to work out, I wanted to know that before investing a lot of time in the detailed drawings. I used white charcoal, which seemed to work quite nicely. It’s a little tough to see in these photographs (no steam on left, steam on right), but it looks great in the original. The trick to believable steam is subtlety.

Coloured Pencil Drawing (~7h)

Diligence was my watchword while transcribing the reference photo onto the page. I used a combination of coloured pencils, graphite, and charcoal: coloured pencils for colour (of course), graphite for subtle shading and grays, and charcoal for dark shadows and blacks. Every small detail and subtle change in lighting or shadow I mimicked as best I could, patiently working and re-working areas until I was satisfied. The cup alone took about 4 hours to do.

Erin's Teacup

Some lessons learned:

  • As good as you think you are, you can always learn something from the pros.
  • Working from a carefully taken reference photo is the key to consistent and believable lighting and shadows. Having that photo zoomable on a tablet is fantastic for details.
  • Charcoal and graphite don’t adhere well to the waxy surface of several layers of coloured pencil (note the saucer on the right-hand side; I wanted that shadow darker, but it just wouldn’t take). Do shadows first, colours after.
  • Attack the most difficult parts of the picture first before investing your time in other areas. If something goes irrecoverably wrong, you’ll waste less time.
  • Patience, patience, patience.

Wings

In the process of going through my old artwork to include on this website, I came across a series of three paintings I had done way back in grade 10 or so, that I hadn’t realized at the time went quite well together.

Once I finally saw all three side-by-side I was struck with the idea that together, they could create something more meaningful than the sum of its parts. A little bit of digital photo-editing later, and the three paintings merged to become something of a panoramic storyline, which I like to call “Wings”.

Wings

I remember the first time I came across the word “serendipity” was during one of my art reviews for that class, as my teacher, Ms. Miller, was describing some good artistic choices I hadn’t realized I’d made for some other project. It’s interesting how nine or so years later that same word comes back along with the memory of creating these paintings for the first time.